Proponents welcome the increased focus it gives to influence and legitimacy, and consider this emphasis to be indispensable amidst the irregular competition posed by asymmetric threats across the competition continuum. By looking straight to the conflict, planners miss the “competition” and the opportunity to use IW proactively against current-day challenges.Īs a term, “Irregular Warfare” generates strong emotions within the Department of Defense and across the U.S. This effectively draws an artificial line that treats as ancillary any role for the military in competition short of conflict, through irregular warfare (IW) or otherwise. Although the 2018 National Defense Strategy highlights the changing character of warfare and new threats in strategic competition, many remain myopically focused on preparing only for the high-end warfight.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |